Weed Grinders

A natural herb grinder (or simply, a grinder) is a cylindrical gadget with 2 halves (top and also base) that separate and also have sharp teeth straightened so when both halves are put together, the material (usually marijuana) inside is shredded. Though seemingly intended for usage with natural herbs and also spices for food preparation, they’re a lot more typically made use of to shred marijuana, resulting in an item that can be much more quickly hand-rolled right into a “joint” that burns a lot more evenly. Herb grinders are normally constructed from either metal or plastic and be available in a variety of colors and also polished metals. Traditionally called herb grinders, many people are now calling these devices “weed grinders“.

Some grinders have two or 3 areas instead of just one, with great displays separating the bottom areas from the ones over, hence enabling the weed trichomes, called kief, to be collected separately. Click here for more information.


The Harsh Truth About the War on Drugs

florida courtroomAn addict with three minor possession convictions is arrested on government costs for dealing a small amount of crack. Concern: which of these sentences do prosecutors think about a proper penalty: a) 10 years; b) life without parole? Response: both.

We know this since federal government district attorneys essentially informed the accused, 47-year-old Sandra Avery, from Florida, that she could select either choice as punishment for her medication handling: beg guilty, pass up a test, as well as obtain the 10-year sentence; or go to trial, and, if founded guilty (as mostly all federal government medicine defendants are), spend the rest of her life behind bars.

Sandra Avery’s experience is much from one-of-a-kind. Federal district attorneys repeatedly threaten extreme prison sentences to push medicine accuseds right into waiving their right to test and pleading guilty. And also these are no still risks. Human Rights Watch, in a new guide, computes that accuseds which demand going to trial get sentences generally 3 times as long as those who approve an appeal deal.

Still, in one essential respect Avery’s case is uncommon. Unlike 97 % of the approximately 25,000 drug offenders federally prosecuted annually, she performed in fact insist on a trial. As well as she is now paying very much for that selection. Avery was convicted in 2005 on costs bring, at UNITED STATE district attorneys’ insistence, a mandatory life sentence. Whatever the judge idea of the sentence– as well as we do not know– he had no choice yet to enforce it. And also considering that there is no parole in the federal system, Sandra Avery, which merely transformed 56, will finish her days behind bars.

The idea that punishment must be proportionate– i.e., “suit the criminal activity”– is a bedrock concept of American criminal justice, and also international legislation. However just how can two punishments so starkly various both be said to suit Sandra Avery’s criminal offense? As well as how is it that prosecutors— as opposed to a court– had the single power to identify her fate?

The response begins with necessary minimal sentencing laws. In the “tough-on-crime” 1980s, Congress ratified statutes asking for 5- and also ten-year minimal sentences for medicine crimes. However considering that compulsory sentences are keyed to the weight and also sort of drug associated with an offense, and also take no account of the wrongdoer’s certain duty, federal government district attorneys could– and also often do– impose the same fees against, claim, a messenger that supplies a plan of cocaine throughout town as well as the medicine employer which got it. Meanwhile, courts, whose conventional role is to think about all the conditions of an instance and also tailor punishment correctly, were reduced to digital spectators.

It’s bad enough that small-fry medicine transgressors are acquiring hit with sentences Congress intended for major traffickers. Worse still, necessary minimum regulations encourage district attorneys to ratchet up medicine sentences method over the (already high) 5- or ten-year standards, if the defendant has a criminal history, however small, or owns a weapon, which prosecutors often suggest is in progression of a medicine business.

Appeal arrangements aren’t inherently unjustified. There’s absolutely nothing incorrect with the government offering an accused a small decrease off a sentence– assuming that sentence is simply and proportionate to the offense Yet that’s not what takes place in the majority of drug cases, where district attorneys have the power to threaten (and to impose) prison terms that, in words of one federal government court, can be “so excessively intense they take your breath away.”.

Numerous prosecutors will suggest that the appeal bargains they offer are reasonable as well as fair. However district attorneys are in the business of looking for convictions, and also they typically favor to get them without the problem of needing to go to trial. If an offender will not beg, then considerations of justness usually fall by the wayside. A number of prosecutors informed me, a much longer sentence is the offender’s fault for not pleading.

Prosecutors additionally want criminals that can help them prosecute others. The risk of severe sentences could definitely be effective at convincing offenders to snitch. But so might beating them, or threatening to; that doesn’t make it straight.

In August 2013, Attorney General Eric Holder advised government prosecutors to stay clear of billing particular low-level nonbelligerent culprits with offenses bring necessary minimum sentences. Yet it will certainly take greater than a regulation from the chief law officer, which district attorneys could choose to follow or otherwise, to bring back some fairness and percentage to drug sentencing. Congress needs to step in, with legislation curtailing obligatory minimums and also returning the power to determine sentences where it belongs—- with independent federal government courts.

Sandra Avery was pronounced guilty of a low-level drug infraction for which, probably, even a ten-year sentence might have been as well extreme. Yet life without parole? Avery will spend the rest of her life behind bars, essentially considering that she refused to play ball with the federal government prosecutors. When the regulation permits the government to penalize a defendant for working out a fundamental right– the right to a trial– it’s previous time for a new regulation.

Click here to help us stop this from happening.

Find out who we are.

Why Racism has Spawned from the War on Drugs

The suggestion of a “New Civil Rights Activity” is hopeless. The civil liberties transformation was due not simply to ruthless effort, but a confluence of aspects that made them bear fruit in a manner they hadn’t for centuries previously. Amidst the Cold War, segregation was unpleasant as P.R. Restrictions on immigration given that the 1920s had made it much easier to draw concentration to black individuals. Tv was brand-new. Republicans were chastened after Barry Goldwater’s loss.

police confront protesterThere is nothing equal today. Yet that doesn’t mean it’s time to sit still; we merely have to tighten our focus. Any kind of uptick in “advanced” concepts among blacks in our minute is founded mainly in just what occurred to Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice and also John Crawford in 2012, as well as it is on the prevalence of such cases that we should undoubtedly concentrate. The toxic relationship between black guys as well as police forces is the essential to why we never ever truly surpass race.

Bigotry shows itself in other ways, however no cognitively resilient team of folks really feels “suppressed” in a daily sense by wealth spaces or dumb things folks could state. A world without any racism in any way would certainly resemble a world without dust, as well as playing grounds– made of dirt– are never ever perfectly degree. Few black people would certainly deny any one of that.

A lot of really feel so oppressed as a result of a feeling of cops as more probable to eliminate them for slim or missing factors. Hence, black America has to ask for an end to the War on Medications, which sends out police officers into black neighborhoods to disrupt people in the name of a conclusively fallen short effort, and also stokes up animus and also fear in cops and also blacks alike that helps create situations like Ferguson.

Several state black men are most likely to be murdered by each other. Much of that, however, also indications to the War on Drugs. Black kids mature with papas secured as well as seek recognition elsewhere. With medications prohibited, they cost a markup that provides an ever before tempting alternative to legal help black guys underserved by bad workshops. No War on Drugs, no drug gangs. Black lives would certainly change.

Neglect trying to recapture 1964. Battle the War on Medications, to stop the violence in between cops as well as black men, as well as the violence in between the black males themselves. That’s the best ways to bring Black Lives Matter past hashtags right into making a real difference.

About Drug Peace Festival

drug peace festivalWith the slogan ‘Occupy UNODC Vienna 2012′ the critics of current drug policies based on three UN Conventions will unite during the forthcoming annual meeting of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs.

Fifty years after the 1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs was launched, the global war on drugs has failed, and has had many unintended and devastating consequences worldwide. Use of the major controlled drugs has risen, and supply is cheaper, purer and more available than ever before. The UN conservatively estimates that there are now 250 million drug users worldwide.

Illicit drugs are now the third most valuable industry in the world, after food and oil, estimated to be worth $450 billion a year, all in the control of criminals. Fighting the war on drugs costs the world’s taxpayers incalculable billions each year. An estimated 10 million people are in prison worldwide for drug-related offenses, mostly “little fish” – personal users and small-time dealers. Corruption amongst law-enforcers and politicians, especially in producer and transit countries, has spread as never before, endangering democracy and civil society. Stability, security and development are threatened by the fallout from the war on drugs, as are human rights. Tens of thousands of people die in the drug war each year.

The drug-free world so confidently predicted by supporters of the war on drugs is further than ever from attainment. The policies of prohibition create more harms than they prevent. We must seriously consider shifting resources away from criminalizing tens of millions of otherwise law abiding citizens, and move towards an approach based on health, harm-reduction, cost-effectiveness and respect for human rights. Evidence consistently shows that these health-based approaches deliver better results than criminalization.

Improving our drug policies is one of the key policy challenges of our time.

It is time for world leaders to fundamentally review their strategies in response to the drug phenomenon. That is what the Global Commission on Drug Policy, led by four former Presidents, by Kofi Annan and by other world leaders, has bravely done with its ground-breaking Report, first presented in New York in June, and also at the House of Lords on 17th November 2011.

At the root of current policies lies the 1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. It is time to re-examine this treaty. A document entitled ‘Rewriting the UN Drug Conventions’ has recently been commissioned in order to show how amendments to the conventions could be made which would allow individual countries the freed

om to explore drug policies that best suit their domestic needs, rather than seeking to impose the current “one-size-fits-all” solution. As we cannot eradicate the production, demand or use of drugs, we must find new ways to minimize harms. We should give support to our Governments to explore new policies based on scientific evidence.

For this reason we will occupy the upcoming UNODC Meeting, which will take place between March 12th – March 16th 2012 in Vienna, Austria.